Interested in working with us? Call us on 1.877.724.7800 or fill out this quick form and we will contact you within 24 hours!

Recent Settlements

Robin Curtiss Settles Injured Worker’s Case for $900,000.00

Several weeks ago, Robin Curtiss obtained a $900,000.00 settlement on behalf of an injured working man. Attorney Curtiss obtained an additional $500,000.00 of value for his client by convincing the workers compensation insurance company which had paid the client’s medical bills to forgive its claim for reimbursement. Van Dorn & Curtiss looks forward to helping other working people who are seriously injured through the negligence of another.

Robin Curtiss Settles Lead Poisoned Child’s Case for $650,000.00

Recently, Robin C. Curtiss, Esq. obtained a $650,000.00 settlement on behalf of a lead poisoned child. The child experienced various learning disabilities as a result of the lead exposure. Van Dorn & Curtiss is proud of the result they achieved for this injured child and look forward to representing other victims of lead exposure.

Practice Areas

Van Dorn Blog

Product Liability

Do you drive a Lexus or Toyota? Has your car been recalled?

View All

Legal News

Millions of Blinds Recalled After Reports of Injury, Death...
Posted on 12/27/2009

Recalls and Investigations Plague Toyota | Lexus...
Posted on 12/20/2009

Crib Recall Affects Millions of Families | Injury Attorneys NH...
Posted on 11/29/2009

Defective Children’s Product Injured Many | VT NH Attorney...
Posted on 8/20/2009

Carbon Monoxide Poisoning Settlement Reached | Vermont Attorneys...
Posted on 6/1/2009

CPSIA Will Keep Lead out of Children’s Items | Maine...
Posted on 1/31/2009

New Hampshire Health Inspectors Search Stores for Recalled Peanut Butter Products...
Posted on 1/29/2009

E. Coli Recall in 11 States - Health Risk High...
Posted on 5/22/2008

View All

Van Dorn & Curtiss Blog

Product Liability

3/4/2009
Edward M. Van Dorn, Jr.
Comments (0)

Supreme Court issues opinion in Wyeth v. Levine

A few months ago we posted a blog to our website titled “How does the United States Supreme Court affect personal injury claims in Vermont?” This blog addressed the case of Wyeth v. Levine. In this case, the musician Diana Levine had lost part of her arm due to an infection caused by a painkiller manufactured by Wyeth. During the case, Wyeth asserted that it was not responsible for the personal injuries suffered by Levine because the FDA had approved the painkiller. Wyeth argued that the federal government, through the FDA, regulates drugs, and that people injured as a result of taking such drugs should not be able to sue the drug makers in court as long as they had followed the FDA guidelines.

The Vermont Supreme Court issued a ruling in favor of Diana Levine, holding that Levine was not in fact barred from bringing her suit. The case was appealed all the way to the United States Supreme Court in 2008. The Court issued its opinion, today and agreed with the Vermont Supreme Court and personal injury plaintiff Diana Levine!!

This is a major defeat for the pharmaceutical industry and a major victory for personal injury plaintiffs all over the country. In essence, the Supreme Court held that state law tort suits are not pre-empted by the federal law governing drug labeling. In other words, federal regulations do not trump state actions.

Both attorneys on the case issued opinions to the Wall Street Journal which can be found on their blog. Wyeth’s lawyer said: “We believed that Federal law prohibited the company from revising its product label as the Vermont court required, and we regret that the Supreme Court disagreed. The medical and scientific experts at FDA are in the best position to weigh the risks and benefits of a medicine and to assess how those risks and benefits should be described in the product’s label.”

Levine’s lawyer said: “The Supreme Court’s opinion reaffirms the important role state law plays in promoting consumer safety and providing compensation for injuries. More importantly, the decision permits Ms. Levine to put this chapter behind her and to move on with her life.”