
$875,000 recovered for man injured in automobile/bicycle accident
$750,000 recovered for rear-end auto accident resulting in back surgery
$1,400,000 recovered for victim of industrial accident
$600,000 recovered for man injured in logging accident
$1,600,000 Settlement for Civil Rights Case
Little progress in bridge repairs across US...
Two Window Washers Die in Accident at NYC Building...
Appeals Court Upholds $16 Million Verdict Against Allstate...
Insurance tests raise questions about some pickups...
Allstate Ranks as Worst Insurer for Consumers...
Drew Griffin Tonight - "Keeping them Honest."...
Manchester New Hampshire man dies in motorcycle accident...
Teen fleeing Rottweiler fractures skull...
2008 Presidential Candidates Respond to Ten Questions About Their Health Care Reform Proposals...

Read More About Two Window Washers Die in Accident at NYC Building...
Read More About Little progress in bridge repairs across US...
Read More About Appeals Court Upholds $16 Million Verdict Against Allstate...
WASHINGTON (AP) - The latest crash tests by the insurance industry raise safety questions about small pickups, which are drawing more interest because they get better mileage than larger trucks.
The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety reported Thursday that several small pickups from the 2008 model year offered dismal protection in side crashes. Versions of the Chevrolet Colorado and its twin vehicle, the GMC Canyon, without optional side air bags earned the institute's lowest rating of poor in the side test.
Several pickups were judged marginal, the second-lowest in the four-scale ratings, in the side tests: the Dodge Dakota and Mitsubishi Raider without optional side air bags; the Ford Ranger; Mazda B-Series; and the Nissan Frontier without side air bags. The Ranger and B-Series, which share the same underpinnings, do not offer side air bags.
"More people may be looking at small pickups because of rising gas prices," said Adrian Lund, the institute's president. "Unfortunately, they won't find many that afford state-of-the-art crash protection."
The 2008 Toyota Tacoma was the only small pickup tested to merit the top score in side crashes. The Tacoma was tested with optional side air bags because the equipment will be standard on 2009 Tacoma pickups being shipped to dealers this month, the institute said.
Nearly 9,000 motorists died in side crashes in 2006, the second-most common after front-end accidents. Side air bags have been credited with providing additional protection. Automakers have said they will make the side air bags standard across their fleets by the 2010 model year.
In front-end crashes, the Tacoma, Dakota, Raider and Frontier received the top score, or good; the Ranger, B-Series, Colorado and Canyon earned the second-highest score, acceptable.
The institute noted that only a few of the vehicles offer anti-rollover technology called electronic stability control. Stability control is optional on the Tacoma and Frontier and unavailable on the other vehicles tested. It will be standard equipment on the Tacoma, Colorado and Canyon in 2009.
GM spokeswoman Carolyn Markey said the automaker conducts more than 150 different types of crash tests on its vehicles and said the institute's test is "designed to simulate a very severe crash." She said the Colorado and Canyon have performed well in other consumer tests.
Chrysler LLC spokesman Max Gates said the Dakota had received the highest rating in every category of the government's front-end and side tests. A vehicle's overall safety performance could not be determined by a single test, he said.
Ford spokesman Wes Sherwood said the Ranger was "very competitive" among small pickups and had performed well in government crash tests.
Nissan spokeswoman Jeannine Ginivan said the company designs "all of our products to provide a high level of occupant safety in a wide range of real-world crashes, including side-impact collisions."
Sales of some small pickups have fared better than full-size trucks, which have seen their sales plummet because of high fuel prices. The small pickups offer better fuel economy ratings than large pickups. One version of the Tacoma, for example, has combined fuel efficiency ratings of 22 miles per gallon while versions of the Colorado got a combined 20 mpg, according to the Environmental Protection Agency.
In the institute's side test, the vehicle's side is struck by a barrier moving at 31 miles per hour. The barrier simulates the front end of a pickup or sport utility vehicle. In the government's side-impact tests, a shorter, more lightweight barrier strikes into the side of the vehicle at 38.5 mph.
On the Net:
Insurance Institute for Highway Safety: http://www.iihs.org
Copyright 2008. The Associated Press All Rights Reserved
Read More About Insurance tests raise questions about some pickups...
Read More About Allstate Ranks as Worst Insurer for Consumers...
CNN's Drew Griffin tonight, "Keeping them Honest." (BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: There's an accident in this country every five seconds.
DREW GRIFFIN, CNN CORRESPONDENT (voice-over): It happened in Santa Fe, New Mexico, much the way Allstate describes it in its commercials.
Roxanne Martinez, driving down Cerrillos Road about noon, when the SUV pulled out from Tasuka (ph) Drive.
ROXANNE MARTINEZ, ACCIDENT VICTIM: I remember, you know, like hitting the driver side window. And then I just, I don't know...
GRIFFIN: The passenger side had been sideswiped. On the driver's side Roxanne was smashed against the window.
MARTINEZ: I had upper back pain. I went to chiropractors, physical therapists, massage therapists, acupuncture. They told me that my spine was damaged.
GRIFFIN: The person driving the SUV that hit Martinez was ticketed and had insurance, Allstate. That was good because Martinez was racking up bills, plenty of them -- C.A.T. scans, doctor visits, x-rays, all bills she thought Allstate would cover.
But after three years of fighting over the bills and still hurting from the accident, Allstate came with a take it or leave it offer, $15,000.
MARTINEZ: That was for, I guess, the car, medical -- I mean, that was everything. You know, I thought they'd pay all your bills and, you know, keep on paying your medical bills.
GRIFFIN: Roxanne Martinez was battling Allstate, the second biggest auto insurer in the nation. What she didn't know was that both Allstate and the largest auto insurer, State Farm, had changed the way they handled so-called minor crashes like hers.
(on camera): In an 18-month investigation across the country, CNN found that if you are injured in a minor accident, chances are high the two companies would challenge your medical claim, offering you barely a fraction of your expenses.
(voice-over): They would do it by forcing people into court, dragging out court cases for years and by convincing the public it was all designed to fight growing fraud in the car accident business.
But documents examined by CNN indicate the motive was profit. And Allstate has gone to great lengths to keep those documents secret. In two states where Allstate has been sued, the company has defied judges' orders to make the documents public.
According to Nevada Insurance Law Professor Jeff Stempel, the new get tough strategy is adding up to billions in profit for the insurance companies and little, if anything, for the public.
JEFF STEMPEL, UNIVERSITY LAW PROFESSOR: We can see the policyholders, individually, are getting hurt by being dragged into court on fender bender claims, and yet we don't see any collateral benefit in the form of reduced premiums even for the other policyholders.
So, I think now we can say to continue this kind of program is, in my view, institutionalized bad faith.
GRIFFIN (on camera): We wanted to ask Allstate and State Farm all about this on camera in an interview, but they both said no.
Allstate did send us an e-mail. In an e-mail, Allstate told us it did not believe it would "have any real opportunity of being successful in getting you (CNN) to do a balanced report."
State Farm sent an e-mail too, saying, "We take customer service seriously and seek to pay what we owe promptly, courteously and efficiently, and we handle each claim on its own merits."
And State Farm also added this. "Any attempt to generalize that State Farm has adopted consultant recommendations as other insurers is just plain wrong."
Who is the consultant State Farm refers to? The giant of the consulting industry, McKinsey & Company, hired by both State Farm and Allstate.
McKinsey & Company said it does not discuss any of its clients' business.
And at the same time Roxanne Martinez thought she was in good hands with Allstate, Allstate was being advised by McKinsey in writing to put boxing gloves on those good hands.
That strategy, says Martinez's lawyer, was to take valid claims and pay pennies on the dollar.
Attorney David Berardinelli has written a book about it and is challenging Allstate's strategy in what he hopes will be a class action lawsuit.
(On camera): So if you wanted to increase profit, you would try to chop the small claim?
DAVID BERARDINELLI, ATTORNEY: Sure. If you could take a thousand dollars off of a million claims, do the math.
GRIFFIN: A lot of money.
BERARDINELLI: A lot of money.
GRIFFIN (voice-over): Shannon Kmatz was an Allstate claims agent in New Mexico before she became a cop. She says she was trained by Allstate to treat most minor accident victims as frauds and offer them as little as possible.
SHANNON KMATZ, FORMER ALLSTATE CLAIMS AGENT: A hundred dollars, yes. I've offered people $50. They have minimal damage to the back of their vehicle and they're claiming that they're hurt.
GRIFFIN: Then Kmatz got to see the insurance strategy firsthand from the other side.
KMATZ: I turn around and get in a car accident myself. My car has minimal damage and I can't walk. And I realize, whoa, what am I doing? This is not right.
JIM MATHIS, FORMER INSURANCE COMPANY INSIDER: It really came down to three basic elements. A position of delay, a position of denying a claim and then ultimately, of course, defending that claim that you denied.
GRIFFIN: The three D's.
MATHIS: Exactly.
GRIFFIN: Jim Mathis is a former insurance company insider who now testifies against insurance companies in court.
And the profits are huge?
MATHIS: The profits are good. And as long as the public allows this to occur, the insurance companies will get richer and people will not get a fair and reasonable settlement. Period.
ROBERT HARTWIG, PRESIDENT, INSURANCE INFORAMTION INSTITUTE: Insurers don't blanket and deny claims on any grounds whatsoever.
GRIFFIN: Robert Hartwig is president of the Insurance Information Institute, an insurance industry trade group.
HARTWIG: What insurers are trying to do is monitor costs. And every insurer is under the same pressure to do it.
GRIFFIN (on camera): And this Allstate training manual obtained by CNN details how that was going to be done, by forcing what the manual calls smaller walkaway settlements.
(voice-over): The walkaway settlement for Roxanne Martinez was a take it or leave it offer of $15,000 that came three years after her accident. She said that would pay a little more than half of her costs.
MARTINEZ: It's kind of hard when you're thinking, like, you know, are they going to leave me broke or, you know what -- I mean, that's what -- that was very stressful.
(END VIDEOTAPE)
ROBERTS: And when we come back, we'll tell you what can happen when you take an insurance company to court. Also ahead, a sorority that's taking heat for pushing nearly two dozen members out the door. The sorority says the women weren't recruiting enough new members. The women say the reason they were kicked out is skin deep, pure and simple.
When 360 continues.
(COMMERCIAL BREAK)
ROBERTS: Before the break, we introduced you to a woman who says she was put through the wringer by car insurance giant Allstate. She said that Allstate wanted her to settle for thousands of dollars less than what she was entitled to.
She refused the deal that they offered and went to court. And that's where she says the battle got even tougher.
Her case isn't an isolated one, however. As our reporting reveals, accident victims across the country are fighting back against the insurance companies they thought would protect them.
Once again, CNN's Drew Griffin.
(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)
GRIFFIN: When Ann Taylor's car was rear-ended...
ANN TAYLOR, ACCIDENT VICTIM: I woke up the next morning. I couldn't move. I had severe pain in my back, down both legs were numb and tingly.
GRIFFIN: The doctor diagnosed herniated disk muscle tears, and the treatment would mean time off work, therapy and medical bills.
The person who hit her was a State Farm employee driving a State Farm car. So Taylor thought at least financially she'd be covered.
It added up, said Taylor, to $15,000. But after dragging out her claim, State Farm offered her only $2,000.
TAYLOR: I was just very insulted.
GRIFFIN: Taylor hired Attorney Jeff Cooke and decided she would fight. It turned into a major legal battle eventually ending up in this courtroom.
Taylor's case is an example of how the two largest auto insurance companies, State Farm and Allstate, have changed the way they handle claims when people are hurt in minor impact crashes.
CNN's investigation reveals a strategy to increase profits by limiting payments to accident victims. And former insurance insiders say most of the industry has adopted the strategy.
Allstate and State Farm, the industry leaders, would not talk to CNN for this report. But Jim Mathis, a former insurance company insider, who now testifies against the insurance business in court, did. And he says cutting payments to people like Taylor has meant billions for the insurance companies.
MATHIS: It's not based on what should be a settlement value or offer to this claimant. It's not based on ethics. It's based on -- it's not based on profits. It's based on how much profit.
GRIFFIN: Taylor's case finally got to court three years after her accident. Her lawyer brought in medical testimony. To present its case, State Farm just dug deep into Ann Taylor's past.
JEFFREY COOKE, TAYLOR'S ATTORNEY: The lawyer stands up and says to Ann Taylor during her cross-examination, tell the jury about your back injury when you were 16 years old.
GRIFFIN: In fact, the attorney for State Farm raised questions about Ann Taylor falling off a horse when she was in high school. And the lawyer also asked Taylor, a nurse, about throwing out her back when she moved a patient.
(On camera): The attorney even brought up personal things that Ann Taylor had to sell a horse, that Ann Taylor had to sell her house, that Ann Taylor had even broken up with a longtime boyfriend, and couldn't all these things add to stress and that could have caused her back pain?
TAYLOR: They didn't have any expert testimony. They never had a physician look at me.
GRIFFIN (voice-over): They tried to make you out to be a liar.
TAYLOR: Exactly.
GRIFFIN: The attorney for State Farm did produce one piece of evidence, very large photos of two slightly damaged cars.
TAYLOR: They expected the jury to see those and to say, she really wasn't hurt.
GRIFFIN: Michael Freeman is a crash expert, often called in to testify when insurance companies are trying to use photos to deny a crash victim was injured.
How do the insurance companies use photos? Well, take a look at a photo of a car with minimal damage, he says, and convince the jury what they probably were already thinking. That doesn't look like much. How could that person be hurt?
MICHAEL FREEMAN, FORENSIC EPIDEMIOLOGIST: You're eventually being judged by what your car looks like, not by what your doctor says or by what the impact of a particular crash has had or injury has had on your life. That's not fair. It's not right. It's fraud.
GRIFFIN: What stunned Taylor in the end is that State Farm's strategy worked. The jury didn't believe she was hurt. They awarded her just $1,500, less than what State Farm originally offered.
We contacted three of the jurors. They said this photo played a big part in their verdict. And they thought the insurance company had already paid its share and Taylor was only trying to get more.
Why did they look at her and must have assumed this lady is trying to rip off the insurance companies, she's a fraud.
COOKE: When she walked in the courtroom and she walked to the jury box and she walked to the testimony box and she walked out of the courtroom at lunch and at the end of a day, they assumed that she was not significantly injured.
GRIFFIN: It's a case straight out of the McKinsey playbook, the three D's. By denying her claim, State Farm forced Taylor to hire an attorney and sue. After a three-year delay, Taylor walked into a courtroom with no noticeable pain. And by defending the case for years, State Farm forced her attorney to front expensive litigation costs, which in the end he didn't get back.
FREEMAN: They make these cases so expensive to litigate that attorneys won't want to take them.
GRIFFIN: Indianapolis superior court judge David Dreyer says he hears it from his colleagues across the country, courts bogged down with minor impact cases. He says the insurance companies' own lawyers admit to him they're being forced to drag the cases out.
JUDGE DAVID DREYER, INDIANAPOLIS SUPERIOR COURT: They've confided to me that they would rather settle a case, and that they aren't allowed to settle by the insurance companies that of course control the defense.
GRIFFIN: It's a strategy spelled out in this affidavit from a former Allstate attorney in a lawsuit against Allstate. She explains how 10 years ago the insurance giant was changing the way it did business, driving lawyers out.
The former Allstate attorney says Allstate's strategy was to make fighting the company "... so expensive and so time consuming that lawyers would start refusing to help clients." The president of the Insurance Information Institute says the change was need.
ROBERT HARTWIG, PRESIDENT, INSURANCE INFORMATION INST.: We have a group of attorneys, quite frankly, who are very upset because, guess what? The gravy train has ended.
MARTINEZ: She had, like, taken off the other way.
GRIFFIN: Remember Roxanne Martinez from the beginning of our investigation? She was sideswiped, and Allstate offered her $15,000 to cover her medical bills and lost wages. Her case also dragged on for years. But after listening to what her lawyer said it was a deliberate attempt to drag Martinez through the wringer, her jury awarded $167,000 plus interest.
MARTINEZ: And I was happy. I thought, well, you know, all my bills are getting paid.
GRIFFIN: Industry insiders say 80 to 90 percent of accident victims don't fight. They take what the insurance company offers.
Read More About Manchester New Hampshire man dies in motorcycle accident...
Read More About Teen fleeing Rottweiler fractures skull...
As New Hampshire and Vermont personal injury lawyers, many of our clients are victims of car accidents. When it comes to car accidents, one of the oldest tricks defense lawyers and insurance companies use is the inference that if there is little damage to the vehicle, the accident wasn’t severe, thus, there cannot be injuries to the passengers. This tactic is used to deny car accident victims compensations for their injuries. Though it seems like a logical conclusion, several studies have shown that there is no relationship between vehicular damage and injuries to the vehicle’s passengers. In fact, it is possible to have a great deal of damage to a vehicle and have no injuries whatsoever, just as it is possible to have no real vehicular damage and significant injuries.
This phenomenon can be explained in mathematical equations and biophysical analysis, however, I am not a physics expert, and you don’t need one to explain how vehicular damage doesn’t relate to personal injury. Think about modern cars. Their exteriors are made with flexible metals and plastics that crumple easily during a collision. That is what they are designed to do. Cars are designed with “crumple zones” that absorb the energy of the car or object that it is colliding with.
An easier way to look at this is a racecar that is involved in an accident on the track. Many times these crashes look horrific as the exterior is crushed or it shreds apart. Many times, the drivers are able to get out of the car and walk away. The reason for this is that the exterior of the car absorbs the impact. Similarly, if the driver of a vehicle designed with crumples zones is involved in a car accident, the crumple zones absorb the energy of the impact. The car may be damaged, but the passenger will have felt little effects. If it is an older car, without crumple zones, the car that is impacted will not absorb the energy of the accident. The result of this type of car accident is the passenger absorbs the energy of the impact. The passengers may violently lurch forward, often resulting in whiplash. This result can be worse if a passenger is not wearing a seatbelt, as they can lurch forward and hit the windshield or dashboard.
If you are in an auto accident, it is always important to seek medical attention if you are feeling any ill effects. Though an accident may look minor because of the lack of damage, injuries are still possible.
Read More About E. Coli Recall in 11 States - Health Risk High...
To speak about your case with the lawyers of Van Dorn and Curtiss, complete the form below or call us on our toll free number: 1-866-632-8980
Van Dorn & Curtiss
633 Main Street
Route 10
P.O. Box 263
Orford, NH 03777-0263
Phone: (866) 632-8980